Legal Opinion

Roman v. State

Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)

Decided August 17, 2004No. 14-03-00404-CRPublishedCited by 53 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MAJORITY OPINION

WANDA McKEE FOWLER, Justice.

The jury convicted appellant of delivery of a controlled substance over 400 grams and assessed punishment at forty years’ confinement, and a $50,000 fine. Appellant is complaining about actions taken before his conviction — actions and words of the trial judge, who he claims could not consider the full range of punishment.

In a single issue, appellant complains that the trial judge should have been re-cused and that the judge hearing appellant’s motion to recuse erred in denying it. We hold that the trial judge exhibited a bias — a bent or tendency —…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  2. United States v. Grinnell Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Kemp v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
  4. De Leon v. AguilarCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 2004
  5. Arnold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by53 opinions

  1. Abdygapparova v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2007
  2. Kniatt v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2007
  3. Gary Carson v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 6th District (Texarkana)2017
  4. Alexis Flores v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2012
  5. Adrian Heath v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2016

48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API