Legal Opinion

Hebard v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided March 25, 1988No. 86-484PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWhite, J.

This appeal arises from an order of the district court for Douglas County sustaining the appellee’s demurrer and dismissing appellant’s amended petition.

Appellant’s amended petition alleges that he accepted employment with Northwestern Bell Telephone Company on or about May 15,1960. On January 1,1984, American Telephone and Telegraph Company, Inc. (AT&T), was forced to divest itself of several of its companies, one of which was Northwestern Bell.

At the time of divestiture, appellant, Tom W. Hebard, held the position of telemarketing consultant. Appellant alleges that he was involuntarily…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Toussaint v. Blue Cross & Blue ShieldMichigan Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Johnston v. Panhandle Cooperative Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Ambroz v. Cornhusker Square Ltd.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Jeffers v. Bishop Clarkson Memorial HospitalNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
  5. Ritchie v. Michigan Consolidated Gas Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Schoneweis v. DandoNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Hillie v. Mutual of Omaha InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Overmier v. ParksNebraska Supreme Court · 1993
  4. Renner v. WurdemanNebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Hamersky v. Nicholson Supply Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1994

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API