Legal Opinion

Schoneweis v. Dando

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1989No. 87-372PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

By her amended petition, plaintiff-appellant, Alice Schoneweis, asserts, so far as is relevant to this appeal, that the defendant-appellee John Dando and his employer, defendant-appellee First National Bank of Beatrice, a national banking association, invaded her privacy and wrongfully revealed her financial condition to others. Each of the defendants demurred under the provisions of Neb. Rev. Stat. § 25-806 (Reissue 1985) on the grounds Schoneweis’ amended petition both misjoined causes of action and failed to state facts constituting any cause of action. The district court sustained the…

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Time, Inc. v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  3. Old Dominion Branch No. 496 v. AustinSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  4. Bertell Ollman v. Rowland Evans, Robert NovakCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  5. Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Hopewell Enterprises v. Trustmark BankMississippi Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Robotham Ex Rel. Robotham v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Deuth v. RatiganNebraska Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Widga v. SandellNebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Custom Fabricators of Granite & Marble Inc. v. LenarduzziNebraska Supreme Court · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API