Legal Opinion

London Guaranty & Accident Co. v. Industrial Accident Board

Montana Supreme Court

Decided May 3, 1928No. 6,318PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Callaway

This lawsuit grew out of a dispute over the application of two sections of the Workmen’s Compensation Act, or, more specifically, over the question whether section 2921, Revised Codes 1921, is superseded by the 1925 amendment of section 2917, Revised Codes 1921 (Session Laws 1925, Chap. 121, p. 209).

The facts are that Great Western Sugar Company, operating in Yellowstone county, carried compensation insurance under plan 2 of the Act. The plaintiff, London Guaranty & Accident Company, Ltd., is the insurance carrier of the Great Western Sugar Company. Claude Cox, while in the employ of the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Jobb v. County of MeagherMontana Supreme Court · 1898
  2. State v. BowkerMontana Supreme Court · 1922
  3. State ex rel. Aachen & Munich Fire Insurance v. RotwittMontana Supreme Court · 1895
  4. In re NaegeleMontana Supreme Court · 1924
  5. City of Butte v. Industrial Accident BoardMontana Supreme Court · 1916

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Malott v. Board of County CommissionersMontana Supreme Court · 1930
  2. Dayberry v. City of East HelenaMontana Supreme Court · 2003
  3. Ross v. City of Great FallsMontana Supreme Court · 1998
  4. Barth v. ElyMontana Supreme Court · 1929
  5. Fletcher v. PaigeMontana Supreme Court · 1950

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API