Legal Opinion
Palmieri v. Kammerer
District Court, D. Connecticut
Decided January 27, 2010No. 3:08-mc-00292PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RULING ON MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
CHRISTOPHER F. DRONEY, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Gloria Palmieri, brought this action against the defendants, police officers George Kammerer and Joseph Murgo, alleging constitutional violations pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Palmieri alleges that the defendants violated her Fourth Amendment rights by conducting a warrantless search of her home, seizing her lawfully possessed handgun, and obtaining a search warrant by making false representations to the issuing judge. Defendants move for summary judgment on all claims. For the reasons that follow, the…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Anderson v. CreightonSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Thompson v. ClarkDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2019
- Barroca v. SamuelsDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018
- Bryant v. HartfordDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2021
- Hoegemann v. PalmaDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2019
- Norton v. GalliganDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2020
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.