Legal Opinion
Colpitt v. Tull
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided July 18, 1950No. 33632PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Neal, J.
This is an appeal from a decree canceling, in part, an oil and gas lease covering lots 4 and 5 of the northwest quarter of section 6, township 19 north, range 7 east of the I.M., in Creek county. The decree cancels the oil and gas lease as to all the land, except ten acres (40 rods square) in the northwest corner of said 80-acre tract.
Vida M. Tull and I. A. Tull, wife and husband, are the owners of the surface rights in and to said 80-acre tract of land and an undivided one-half of the oil, gas and other minerals therein, and Mable Dale Potts and Dr. J. R. Potts, wife and husband, are the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Doss Oil Royalty Co. v. Texas CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- Hudspeth v. SchmelzerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Ramsey Petroleum Corporation v. DavisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- McKenna v. NichlosSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
3Cited by15 opinions
- Trawick v. E. L. CastleberrySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Trust Co. Of Chicago v. Samedan Oil CorpCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1951
- Texas Consolidated Oils v. VannSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1953
- Gregg v. Harper-Turner Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1952
- Kunc v. Harper-Turner Oil CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.