Legal Opinion
Bryfogle v. Carvel Corp.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided July 14, 1987No. Civ. A. 87-983PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
HUYETT, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, James and Mitzi Bryfogle (“the Bryfogles”) entered into a written franchise agreement (“License Agreement”) with defendant, Carvel Corporation (“Carvel”) on May 13,1975 under which the plaintiffs operated a Carvel ice cream store. The parties continued as franchisor and franchisee until the License Agreement expired in October, 1985, when the Bryfo-gles vacated the premises. On January 26, 1986, Carvel terminated its lease of the store. Subsequently, the Bryfogles entered into a lease for the identical property and commenced business on…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Brotherhood of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers, Local No. 70Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Continental Insurance Co. v. Kenneth BodieCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Den-Tal-Ez, Inc. v. Siemens Capital Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Di Loreto v. CostiganDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2009
- Hunter v. Greenwood Trust Co.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1992
- Boggs v. HarrisDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2016
- In Re GNC Franchising, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 2000
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.