Legal Opinion
United States v. Ehrlichman
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided July 3, 1974No. Crim. 74-116PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
GESELL, District Judge.
Defendant Liddy, by his counsel, has orally moved to strike the testimony of E. Howard Hunt, a Government witness, at the conclusion of his direct testimony on the ground that prior testimony of Hunt given under oath in executive session before the Subcommittee on Intelligence of the House Armed Services Committee last year has not been produced, in alleged violation of Liddy’s rights under the Jencks Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3500, Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 83 S.Ct. 1194, 10 L.Ed.2d 215 (1963), and the Fifth and Sixth Amendments to the Constitution of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Washington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Gravel v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- United States v. AugenblickSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. BrewsterSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. HaldemanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- United States v. DanskerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1976
- William L. Calley, Jr., Cross-Appellant v. Howard H. Callaway, Etc., Etc., Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1975
- United States v. Ubaldo Trevino and Ramiro GonzalezCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1977
- United States v. John H. Weidman, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1978
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.