In re Hooker
Mississippi Supreme Court
1Concurrence
CARLSON, Presiding Justice,
specially concurring:
¶ 61. While I wholeheartedly concur with the majority opinion, I am compelled to write in response to the separate opinions in this case. Let me first state that there is a division on this Court in this case because there is a disagreement as to the identification of the critical issue confronting this Court today. In my opinion, Presiding Justice Dickinson succinctly states the issue before us in paragraph four of his majority opinion: “[T]he controlling issue is not whether Section 124 requires applicants for pardons to publish notice — it…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Marbury v. MadisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1803
- Nixon v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Pro-Choice Mississippi v. FordiceMississippi Supreme Court · 1998
- Ex parte WrenMississippi Supreme Court · 1886
- Hunt v. WrightMississippi Supreme Court · 1892
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.