Legal Opinion

Pro-Choice Mississippi v. Fordice

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided August 13, 1998No. 95-CA-00960-SCTPublishedCited by 56 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

716 So.2d 645 (1998)

PRO-CHOICE MISSISSIPPI, on Behalf of Itself and Its Members, Joseph Booker, M.D., Tom Tvedten, M.D. and New Woman Medical Center

v.

Kirk FORDICE, Governor of the State of Mississippi and His Employees, Agents and Successors; Mike Moore, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi and His Employees, Agents and Successors; and Mississippi State Department of Health.

No. 95-CA-00960-SCT.

Supreme Court of Mississippi.

August 13, 1998.

Catherine Albisa, Katherine Kolbert, New York City, Robert B. McDuff, Jackson, for Appellants.

Michael C. Moore, Attorney General, T. Hunt Cole,…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Smith; Concurrence · Smith; Dissent; Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited88 opinions

  1. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  2. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  3. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Rochin v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
  5. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

83 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Planned Parenthood v. FarmerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2000
  2. Hodes & Nauser, MDS, P.A. v. SchmidtSupreme Court of Kansas · 2019
  3. Clinic for Women, Inc. v. BrizziIndiana Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Dunn v. DunnMississippi Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Planned Parenthood of the Heartland and Jill Meadows v. Kimberly K. Reynolds ex rel. State of Iowa and Iowa Board of MedicineSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API