Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. Cunningham

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided February 12, 2013No. AC 33403PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BEAR, J.

The plaintiff, Mary V. Cunningham, appeals from the judgment of the trial court setting forth its *678financial orders incident to the dissolution of the marriage of the plaintiff and the defendant, Gerard J. Cunningham. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the court (1) abused its discretion in the manner in which it divided the defendant’s nonqualified, nonfunded retirement plan (nonqualified plan) and that the division is unworkable and (2) abused its discretion in crafting its alimony award. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.

The following facts are necessary to our…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Majauskas v. MajauskasNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
  2. Krafick v. KrafickSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  3. Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
  4. Thompson v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1981
  5. Ippolito v. IppolitoConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Cunningham v. CunninghamConnecticut Appellate Court · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API