Woody v. Pickelsimer
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
Winborne, C. J.:
Appeal by plaintiff, Jonathan H. Woody.
At the outset attention is again directed to Rules 19 (3) and 21 of the Rules of Practice in Supreme Court— Appendix 1 of Volume 4A of the General Statutes; also 221 N.C. 544, and see early case Pruitt v. Wood, 199 N.C. 788, 156 S.E. 126, and late case Hunt v. Davis, 248 N.C. 69, 102 S.E. 2d, 405, and many intervening cases. Many of the assignments of error in the main are deficient. However enough are preserved to present determinative questions.
Among the assignments of error presented on this appeal, appellant Jonathan H. Woody points…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Pruitt v. WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Pruitt v. . WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
- Insurance Co. v. . McCrawSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
- Hunt v. DavisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1958
- Town of Fuquay Springs v. RowlandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Givens v. SellarsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
- Capps v. LynchSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Redevelopment Commission of Greensboro v. HaginsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- Newman MacHine Company v. NewmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
- Skinner v. Empresa Transformadora De Productos AgropecuariosSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.