Legal Opinion
Broad v. Conway
District Court, N.D. New York
Decided December 23, 1987No. 87-CV-1331PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM-DECISION AND ORDER
McCURN, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Paul and Anna Broad, commenced this action against the law firm of DeGraff, Foy, Conway, Holt-Harris & Mealey (“the DeGraff firm”) and two partners in that firm, William Conway and Robert Iseman, basically alleging legal malpractice by those defendants. Presently before the court is defendants’ motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ. 56. For the reasons discussed herein, defendants’ motion is granted.
BACKGROUND
In June of 1982, plaintiffs contacted William Conway, a partner in the DeGraff firm, regarding the possibility…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Chapadeau v. Utica Observer-Dispatch, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1975
- Robles v. CoughlinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
- Gaeta v. New York News Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1984
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Schweizer v. MulvehillDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- James Carmel, Trustee for the Bankruptcy Estate of Emil Stavriotis and Judith Stavriotis v. Clapp & Eisenberg, P.C., and Gerald LitwinCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1992
- Broad v. ConwayCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988