Legal Opinion

Robles v. Coughlin

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided December 27, 1983No. Nos. 290-292, Dockets 83-2008, 83-2010 and 83-2012PublishedCited by 196 opinions

1Per curiam

In these consolidated appeals we are asked to determine the sufficiency of prisoners’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pro se complaints which were accompanied by requests to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. The appellants challenge the dismissal of the complaints sua sponte by the district courts herein. Recognizing that sua sponte dismissal prior to service of process upon defendants is strongly disfavored in this circuit, and finding that the complaints herein appear to allege a cognizable claim under section 1983, we reverse and remand to the district courts for further proceedings.

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Bell v. WolfishSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Hughes v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Ramos v. LammCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1980
  5. Cooper v. PateSupreme Court of the United States · 1964

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by196 opinions

  1. Christopher Shorter v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2021
  2. Willey v. KirkpatrickCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  3. Phelps v. KapnolasCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2002
  4. Foster v. RunnelsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  5. Rodriguez v. WeprinCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997

191 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API