Marks v. Gates
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the CourtGilbert, Circuit Judge
The enforcement of a contract by a decree for its specific performance rests in the sound discretion of the court — a judicial discretion to be exercised in accordance with established principles of equity. A contract may be valid in law and not subject to cancellation in equity, and yet the terms thereof, the attendant circumstances, and in some cases the subsequent events, may be such as to require the court to deny its specific performance. In Pomeroy, § 400. it is said: “He who seeks equity must do equity. The doctrine, thus applied, means that the party asking the aid of the court must…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Willard v. TayloeSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Pope Manufacturing Co. v. GormullySupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Cooley v. . LobdellNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- Milkman v. OrdwayMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1870
- King and Others v. Hamilton and OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1830
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by26 opinions
- United States v. Georgia-Pacific CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Resource Management Co. v. Weston RanchUtah Supreme Court · 1985
- Palmer v. ChamberlinCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1951
- Maxwell v. Fidelity Financial Services, Inc.Arizona Supreme Court · 1995
- United States v. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.