Legal Opinion · Dissent

Smith v. State

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided August 12, 2005No. 116, September Term, 2004Published

1Dissent

Dissenting Opinion by

HARRELL, J.

which WILNER and GREENE, JJ., Join.

The basis upon which the majority here faults the trial judge is that she abused her discretion when she limited the scope of defense counsel’s closing to preclude arguing an alleged generalized difficulty inhering in cross-racial eyewitness identification situations due to own-race bias. For a number of reasons, I respectfully dissent. I would affirm the judgment of the Court of Special Appeals and the Circuit Court for Baltimore City.

I

A

Although the majority opinion sufficiently summed up the accepted principles regarding the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  3. Wilhelm v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  4. Reed v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1978
  5. Faya v. AlmarazCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1993

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API