Legal Opinion

Stubbs v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided June 21, 1967No. 42648PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Per curiam

To the plaintiff’s action for loss of consortium, alleged to have resulted from a collision caused by the negligent operation of the defendant Greyhound Lines’ bus by the defendant Johnson, the defendants pleaded accident and upon the trial offered evidence that the collision was caused by ice formations on the street which the defendants could not reasonably have anticipated. The jury returned a verdict in favor of the defendants.

Submitted March 8, 1967 June 21, 1967. James O. Goggins, for appellant. Gambrell, Harlan, Russell & Moye, Edward W. Killorin, George W. Hart, for appellees.

1. The…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Nathan v. DuncanCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  2. McBride v. Georgia Railway & Electric Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1906
  3. Parsons v. FosheeCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1949
  4. Southwire Co. v. Franklin Aluminum Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1966
  5. Barlow v. RushinCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1966

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hieber v. WattCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1969
  2. Claxton Poultry Co. v. City of ClaxtonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1980
  3. Parham v. RoachCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  4. Foy v. EdwardsCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1968
  5. Christiansen v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API