Legal Opinion
Nigro v. Flinn
Superior Court of Delaware
Decided June 21, 1937No. 180PublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Layton, C. J.,
delivering the opinion of the Court:
The question raised by the demurrer is whether an action to recover damages for personal injuries is barred absolutely after the expiration of one year from the accural of the cause, as provided by Section 10 of Chapter 146 of the Revised Code of 1915, notwithstanding the saving of ' the disability of infancy contained in Section 14.
The plaintiff contends that the Act adopting the Revision repealed all pre-existing statutory law, and enacted a' new body thereof; that the meaning and effect of Section 10 miust be determined from the language of…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- United States v. GoldenbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1898
- Anderson v. Pacific Coast Steamship Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Byfield v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1923
- Cantor v. SachsCourt of Chancery of Delaware · 1932
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- Layton v. AllenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
- Coastal Barge Corp. v. Coastal Zone Industrial Control BoardSupreme Court of Delaware · 1985
- Monacelli v. GrimesSupreme Court of Delaware · 1953
- Darling Apartment Co. v. SpringerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1941
- Hurwitch v. AdamsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1959
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.