Legal Opinion

Giulietti v. Oncology Associates of Oregon, P.C.

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 5, 2001No. 16-00-08662; A111414PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEdmonds, P. J.

Plaintiff appeals after the trial court granted defendants’ ORCP 21 A motion and dismissed his medical malpractice action on the ground that it was not brought within the statute of limitations. Plaintiff contends that defendants’ failure to comply with UTCR 5.010(1), requiring a moving party to confer with the opposing party before filing a motion, should have resulted in the denial of defendants’ motion. Alternatively, he contends that the action was commenced within the statutory limitation period for this action under ORS 30.075. We reverse and remand.

Plaintiff James Giulietti is the…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Redfield v. Mead, Johnson & CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  2. Gladhart v. Oregon Vineyard Supply Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Eldridge v. Eastmoreland General HospitalOregon Supreme Court · 1989

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Bell v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Bell v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Bell v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Calhoon v. ThierolfDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2021
  5. Uranga and GableCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API