Legal Opinion

Bell v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 25, 2012No. 090913232; A145225PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.

Plaintiff, decedent’s personal representative, appeals from a general judgment of dismissal in this personal injury-action against a public body, Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (TriMet). Plaintiff assigns error to the trial court’s allowance of TriMet’s motion to dismiss on statute of limitations grounds, based on the two-year limitation period in ORS 30.275(9). Plaintiff argues that, in the circumstances presented here, the applicable period for commencing his action is the three-year period in ORS 30.075(1), and not the two-year limitation of ORS 30.275(9). For…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
  2. Redfield v. Mead, Johnson & CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Baker v. City of LakesideOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Smith v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
  5. Giulietti v. Oncology Associates of Oregon, P.C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Bell v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  2. Macnab v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
  3. Bell v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Uranga and GableCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API