Bell v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtHaselton, P. J.
Plaintiff, decedent’s personal representative, appeals from a general judgment of dismissal in this personal injury-action against a public body, Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation District of Oregon (TriMet). Plaintiff assigns error to the trial court’s allowance of TriMet’s motion to dismiss on statute of limitations grounds, based on the two-year limitation period in ORS 30.275(9). Plaintiff argues that, in the circumstances presented here, the applicable period for commencing his action is the three-year period in ORS 30.075(1), and not the two-year limitation of ORS 30.275(9). For…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. GainesOregon Supreme Court · 2009
- Redfield v. Mead, Johnson & CompanyOregon Supreme Court · 1973
- Baker v. City of LakesideOregon Supreme Court · 2007
- Smith v. WellsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1994
- Giulietti v. Oncology Associates of Oregon, P.C.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Bell v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- Macnab v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2012
- Bell v. Tri-County Metropolitan Transportation DistrictOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- Uranga and GableCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2026