Legal Opinion

Williams v. Frame

District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania

Decided December 16, 1992No. Civ. A. No. 92-5411PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM

ROBRENO, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Willie Ray Williams (“Williams”) and Michelle Dejesus (“Dejesus”) have filed a single complaint purporting to state claims for various alleged civil rights violations, respectively. For the following reasons, the complaint will be returned to plaintiff Dejesus for further action in conformity with this memorandum.

Although plaintiff Williams signed the complaint, plaintiff Dejesus did not, Fed. R.Civ.P. 11, and while Williams submitted an application to proceed in forma pauper-is, Dejesus did not submit either the appropriate filing fee, 28 U.S.C. §…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eagle Associates v. Bank of MontrealCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  2. Turner v. American Bar Ass'nDistrict Court, S.D. Alabama · 1975
  3. Daniel M. Pilla and Jerome Daly v. The American Bar AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
  4. Move Organization v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1983
  5. Adams v. Perloff Brothers, Inc.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1992

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Black v. Ameritel Inns, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Hoover v. West Virginia Board of MedicineWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Williams v. FrameDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1993
  4. Black v. Ameritel Inns, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Hoover v. West Virginia Board of MedicineWest Virginia Supreme Court · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API