Legal Opinion
Black v. Ameritel Inns, Inc.
Idaho Supreme Court
Decided November 25, 2003No. 29580PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KIDWELL, Justice.
Robert Black and Robert Marks (Appellants) sued Ameritel Inns, Inc. (Ameritel), alleging they were denied accommodations because they were Gypsies. The Appellants’ attorney, licensed in Washington but not Idaho, filed a complaint in Idaho district court and signed the Appellants’ names as the agent of unrepresented persons. The district court granted Ameritel’s motion to strike the complaint because it was not signed as required by Rule 11(a)(1). The district court rejected the Appellants’ subsequent motion to reconsider after an attorney licensed in Idaho filed an amended…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Gonzales v. WyattCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
- Edwin C. Covington v. Aubrey Cole, Individually and in His Official Capacity as Sheriff of Jaspercounty, TexasCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
- IRON EAGLE DEVELOPMENT, LLC. v. Quality Design Systems, Inc.Idaho Supreme Court · 2003
- Wrenn v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
- John M. And Alice D. Church v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- West Wood Investments, Inc. v. AcordIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
- National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh v. DixonIdaho Supreme Court · 2005
- Terra-West, Inc. v. Idaho Mutual Trust, LLCIdaho Supreme Court · 2010
- Goldman v. GrahamIdaho Supreme Court · 2004
- Biomed Comm, Inc. v. STATE, DEPT. OF HEALTH BD.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2008
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.