Legal Opinion

Lockhart, Admr. v. Butt-Landstreet

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided March 13, 1926PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtStrum, J.

— Plaintiff in error, as plaintiff bel.ow, instituted an action at law against defendants in error to enforce .a statutory lien for materials furnished' by the • plaintiff in the construction of a building. See Sec. 3519, Rev. Gen. Stats. 1920. Defendants below, Butt-Landstreet, Inc., and E. R. Feagin, are alleged to be, respectively, the owner of the land and building against which the lien is sought to be enforced, and the contractor for the erection of the building under a contract with the owner. The plaintiff materialman and the defendant owner were not in privity. ' The defendants filed…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ruff v. Georgia, Southern & Florida Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1914
  2. Carney v. StringfellowSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  3. Cheney v. RobertsSupreme Court of Florida · 1919
  4. Hainlin v. BudgeSupreme Court of Florida · 1908
  5. Farrell v. SolarySupreme Court of Florida · 1901

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hart, Et Vir v. HeldSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  2. Atlantic Peninsular Holding Co. v. OenbrinkSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
  3. Knudsen v. HanlonSupreme Court of Florida · 1948
  4. Beckwith v. BaileySupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  5. City of Miami v. BoppSupreme Court of Florida · 1934

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API