Legal Opinion

Knudsen v. Hanlon

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided June 15, 1948PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SEBRING, J.:

The appellees, Hanlon and Balderston, were injured while guests in an automobile owned by the appellant Knudsen. At the time of the accident Hanlon, Balderston, Knudsen and one Lalk were occupants of the car, which was being driven by Lalk in the presence of Knudsen. Hanlon and Balderston sued Knudsen, as owner of the car, in separate actions for damages, alleging gross negligence in the manner of the operation of the vehicle. To the declaration filed in these separate actions Knudsen interposed identical pleas of not guilty, assumption of risk amounting to contributory…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Carney v. StringfellowSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
  2. Hart, Et Vir v. HeldSupreme Court of Florida · 1941
  3. Lockhart, Admr. v. Butt-LandstreetSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
  4. Gulf Refining Co. v. HowardSupreme Court of Florida · 1921
  5. Kight v. American Eagle Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Florida · 1938

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Bessett v. HackettSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  2. Kelty v. Best Cabs, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  3. Henley v. CarterSupreme Court of Florida · 1953
  4. Walker v. Loop Fish & Oyster Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  5. Corbett v. Seaboard Coastline RR Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1979

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API