Cheney v. Roberts
Supreme Court of Florida
An Appeal from the Circuit Court for Pinellas County; O. K. Reaves, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtWhitfield, J.
— A judgment was obtained by Cheyney against Roberts on promisory notes. In ancillary garnishment proceedings in the cause brought by Cheyney against Carter Manufacturing Company garnishee, a verdict was rendered on a traverse of the answer in garnishment that the garnishee company were then and. at the time the writ of garnishment was served, in possession of stated articles of property belonging to the defendant Roberts. The court granted a new trial on motion of the garnishee company and Cheyney took writ of error thereto under the statute. Sec. 1695, Gen Stats. 1906, Cimpiled Laws 1914;…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ruff v. Georgia, Southern & Florida Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1914
- Carney v. StringfellowSupreme Court of Florida · 1917
- Farrell v. SolarySupreme Court of Florida · 1901
- Cotton States Belting & Supply Co. v. Florida Railway Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1915
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. WadeSupreme Court of Florida · 1905
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- Phillips v. LowensteinSupreme Court of Florida · 1926
- Holstun & Son v. EmbrySupreme Court of Florida · 1936
- Atlantic Peninsular Holding Co. v. OenbrinkSupreme Court of Florida · 1938
- Beckwith v. BaileySupreme Court of Florida · 1935
- Tone v. Halsey, Stuart & Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1936
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.