Legal Opinion
Rodgers v. Marshall
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 17, 2012No. 10-55816PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZOUHARY, District Judge:
Introduction
In June 2003, a jury found Petitioner-Appellant Otis Lee Rodgers (“Rodgers”) guilty of assault with a firearm, possession of a firearm and ammunition by a felon, and making criminal threats, as well as two sentencing enhancement allegations. Rodgers was sentenced and is currently serving a sixteen-year prison term.
After exhausting state court remedies, Rodgers filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in federal court, raising twenty-one claims for relief. The district court denied the petition, but granted Rodgers a limited certifícate of…
2Cases cited53 opinions
- Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Penson v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Teague v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
48 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Marshall v. RodgersSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- United States v. Jennifer FrenchCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Stacey Dyer v. Tina HornbeckCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- State v. Pitts.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2014
- Stacey Dyer v. Tina HornbeckCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.