State v. Pitts.
Hawaii Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion of the Court by
McKENNA, J.
1. Introduction
This court accepted Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Joseph Pitts’ Application for Writ of Certiorari 1 and ordered supplemental briefing addressing whether the circuit court erred in not appointing substitute counsel for Pitts for post-verdict motions and sentencing. We hold that the circuit court 2 erred by not appointing substitute counsel for Pitts’ post-verdict motions because post-verdict proceedings are critical stages in the prosecu tion. We also hold that the circuit court erred by not appointing Pitts substitute counsel for sentencing.
II…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- McKaskle v. WigginsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Townsend v. BurkeSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. Phua.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2015
- State v. Loher.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2017
- Pitts v. IgeDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 2019
- State v. Choy Foo.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2018
- State v. DemingHawaii Supreme Court · 2015
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.