Legal Opinion

Duffy v. City of Scranton/Fire Dept.

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 14, 1988No. Appeal, 3653 C. D. 1986PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Senior Judge Barbieri,

The Bureau of Workers’ Compensation (Bureau), acting for the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania, 1 and the City of Scranton (Employer), appeal here the order of the Court of Common Pleas of Lackawanna County which affirmed the grant of widow’s benefits to Mary Duffy (Claimant) by the Workmens Compensation Appeal Board (Board) under The Pennsylvania Occupational Disease Act (Act). 2 We shall affirm.

Claimant’s husband, Michael P. Duffy, had been employed as a fire fighter by the City of Scranton for twenty-one years. As a result of exposures during the performance of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Toffalori v. Donatelli Granite Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1945
  2. Kujawa v. Latrobe Brewing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. Kilvady v. United States Steel Corp.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1985

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Sporio v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  2. Fortely v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Olsen Bodies, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. City of McKeesport v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Sporio v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API