Legal Opinion
McDonald v. Lohman
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided February 11, 1998No. 21648PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MONTGOMERY, Chief Judge.
The Director of Revenue (Director) appeals from the trial court’s “Order” which set aside the Director’s denial of Respondent’s application for a driver’s license and ordered Director to grant Respondent a driver’s license. The Director contends here that the trial court’s order erroneously interpreted and applied § 302.060(9). We do not address that contention because the “Order” is not a judgment under Rule 74.01(a).1
“Even though not raised by the parties, an appellate court is obligated to notice, sua sponte, matters preventing it from obtaining jurisdiction.”…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Committee for Educational Equality v. StateSupreme Court of Missouri · 1994
- City of St. Louis v. HughesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- Chambers v. Easter Fence Co., Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1997
- In Re the Marriage of BergerMissouri Court of Appeals · 1996
- Alfred Carroll Jones and Betty Jones v. City of Johnson City, TennesseeCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1995
3Cited by5 opinions
- Spino v. BhaktaMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- Williams v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- In the Interest of B_ CMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
- Hampton v. King Royal Bros. CircusMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
- Marriage of Tyree v. TyreeMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998