Legal Opinion
Hampton v. King Royal Bros. Circus
Missouri Court of Appeals
Decided June 30, 2004No. 25681PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PHILLIP R. GARRISON, Judge.
T.H.E. Insurance Company (“Appellant”) appeals from the trial court’s order denying its motion to strike interrogatories and motion for summary judgment filed against Margaret Hampton (“Respondent”). Having determined that the order is not denominated a judgment as required by Rule 74.01(a), nor is it a special order pursuant to Section 512.020, we dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 1
On February 8, 2000, Margaret Hampton (“Respondent”) was granted a default judgment in the amount of $200,000 against The King Royal Brothers Circus and Charles Davenport…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of St. Louis v. HughesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- Brooks v. BrooksSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003
- Hampton v. DavenportMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- State ex rel. Westmoreland v. O'BannonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
- Williams v. Director of RevenueMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Citizens for Ground Water Protection v. PorterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- LAKE OSAGE CONDOMINIUM ASS'N v. PrewittMissouri Court of Appeals · 2005
- CITIZENS FOR GR. WATER PROTECTION v. PorterMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008