Legal Opinion
Robinson v. Time Warner, Inc.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 18, 1999No. 97 Civ. 5103(RWS)PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
*145 ORDER
SWEET, District Judge.
On January 25, 1999, plaintiff J. Edward Robinson (“Robinson”) moved, pursuant to Rule 37, Fed.R.Civ.P., for an order compelling both defendant Time Warner, Inc. (“Time Warner”) and Lawrence Levien, Esq. (“Levien”) to make various disclosures, and awarding Robinson attorneys’ fees and costs in connection with the motion. On March 5, 1999, defendant Time Warner brought a reciprocal cross-motion, pursuant to Rule 37, for a protective order preventing the continued deposition of Levien. In this action, plaintiff Robinson alleges that he was the victim of racial…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Upjohn Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Sporck v. PeilCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Bowne of New York City, Inc. v. AmBase Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1993
- Northrop v. Hoffman Of Simsbury, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- Brownell v. Roadway Package System, Inc.District Court, N.D. New York · 1999
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Suss v. MSX International Engineering Services, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2002
- Thomas v. Euro RSCG LifeDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
- Gruss v. ZwirnDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2011
- Hartman v. Lisle Park DistrictDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2001
- Mitre Sports International Ltd. v. Home Box Office, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2015
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.