Legal Opinion

Dominijinni v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 18, 1990No. 330 C.D. 1990PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BARBIERI, Senior Judge.

Intonio Dominijinni (Employer) petitions this Court to review an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which denied his petition for a rehearing. We affirm.

Employer is a bricklayer. In addition to being employed by a building contractor, Employer does small jobs on his own. Employer hired Stephen DeCarlo (Claimant) to help him with these small jobs as a laborer. Claimant’s job duties included mixing cement, handing bricks to Employer, and putting the tools away at the end of the day.

On August 9, 1980, as Claimant was putting the tools away in…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Cudo v. Hallstead Foundry, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Douglas v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Johnson v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  4. General Woodcraft & Foundry v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Anderson v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1980

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. House v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1993
  2. Hebden v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Izzi v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. U.S. Steel Mining Co. v. Workers' Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2005
  5. Dominijinni v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API