Legal Opinion

Gilman v. Joseloff

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided June 21, 1949PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJennings, J.

This is a suit for a temporary and a permanent injunction to restrain the defendants from the further levy of an execution on the bodies of the plaintiffs. The principal question to be decided is whether a levy on the body (capias ad satisfaciendum) can be made under an alias execution after an execution against property (fieri facias) has been returned partially satisfied.

The case was submitted on an agreed statement of facts. No finding is necessary where this course is adopted. On July 8, 1947, the defendant Stanley Nierwakowski recovered a judgment against the plaintiffs for $8131.71…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Campbell v. KlahrSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1930
  2. Roberts v. ChurchSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1845
  3. Marshall Field & Co. v. FreedAppellate Court of Illinois · 1915
  4. The DelawareDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1846
  5. Wheeler v. . BouchelleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1845

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Herzig v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
  2. Larke v. MorrisseySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1967
  3. Sheldon House Club, Inc. v. Town of BranfordSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
  4. Abbit v. BernierDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 1974
  5. Lambrakos v. CarsonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API