Legal Opinion
Vandriss v. Hill
Supreme Court of Kansas
Decided November 6, 1897No. 10031PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Original proceeding in mandamus.
1Opinion of the CourtAllen, J.
This is an action instituted in this court against the township officers of Lakin, Hibbard and South Side Townships, in Kearny County, to compel them to certify to the county clerk a percentage to be levied on their townships to pay interest coupons on certain bonds issued by the township of Lakin, in Finney County, on March 12, 1887. The County Commissioners, the Clerk, and the Treasurer of Kearny County are also joined as defendants, for the purpose of requiring them to perform their official duties in levying and collecting from the townships named taxes for the payment of these bonds.
At…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Commissioners of Laramie County v. COMMISSIONERS OF ALBANY COUNTYSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Mobile v. WatsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Thompson v. AbbottSupreme Court of Missouri · 1875
- Schriber v. Town of LangladeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1886
- Commissioners of Sedgwick County v. BunkerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1876
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Board of Com'rs v. VandrissCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1902
- Garfield Township v. Samuel Dodsworth Book Co.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1899
- Flanigan v. Leavenworth Recreation CommissionSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
- Garfield Township v. FinnupCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1899
- Attorney General Opinion No., Kansas Attorney General Reports2008