Miller v. United States
United States Court of Claims
The Reporter's statement of the case: The facts of the case will be found sufficiently set forth in the opinion of the court. It is hardly necessary to quote authorities to sustain the contention that where a person has been unjustly suspended in the exercise of his official duties and the power having jurisdiction of him as an employee reinstates him that he is entitled to whatever emoluments are attached to the office during such period of suspension.
Read the full summary
The Reporter's statement of the case: The facts of the case will be found sufficiently set forth in the opinion of the court. It is hardly necessary to quote authorities to sustain the contention that where a person has been unjustly suspended in the exercise of his official duties and the power having jurisdiction of him as an employee reinstates him that he is entitled to whatever emoluments are attached to the office during such period of suspension. This doctrine was announced in the Lelbnann case (37 C. Cls. R., p. 135), and in Corcoran’s case (38 ib., p. 345), and again in the case of…
1Opinion of the Court
Peelee, Ch. J.,
delivered the opinion of the court:
The claimant herein was duly appointed by the Public Printer in the Government Printing Office at $6.40 per diem *514in what is known as the classified service. On May 14,1903, he was suspended from the position of assistant foreman of the branch bindery of that office until such time as final action should be taken in the case, of which he was advised, together with the reasons therefor. ,
May 18, 1903, the claimant was notified by the Public Printer that his services would not be required in that office after the expiration of any leave of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Decatur v. PauldingSupreme Court of the United States · 1840
- Keim v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Shurtleff v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- United States v. WickershamSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Lellmann v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Love v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1939
- Nicholas v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1918
- Arthur B. Daub v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
- Arthur B. Daub v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1961
- Watson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1957
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.