Legal Opinion · Dissent

Arthur B. Daub v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided July 19, 1961No. 533-59Published

1DissentWhitaker, Judge

I think my brethren will commit a grave error, eventually involving large sums of money, if they persist in their present intention to hold that an employee, not in the classified civil service, may recover a judgment against the United States', on the sole ground that his discharge was not “in consonance” with the regulations of the Department by which he was employed. In the hope that I may convince them of the error of their ways, or, if not, that the Supreme Court may be persuaded to review the interpretation my brethren put on the decision in Service v. Dulles, 354 U.S. 363, 77 S.Ct.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Service v. DullesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  2. Knotts v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  3. Knotts v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1954
  4. Stringer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
  5. Morgan v. NunnU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Middle Tennessee · 1898

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API