Legal Opinion · Dissent

Watson v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided March 6, 1957No. 49895Published

1Dissent

Littleton, Judge, and Madden, Judge,

dissenting:

We would grant plaintiff’s motion for leave to amend her petition. The proposed amendment does not alter the nature or extent of plaintiff’s claim but merely alters the original petition to show the correct statutory authority for the regulations on which plaintiff bases her claim, i. e., the act of March 3, 1871, R. S. 1753, 16 Stat. 495, 514, the act of January 16, 1883, 22 Stat. 463, and R. S. 161, 5 U. S. C. 22, and to eliminate all reference to the Lloyd-LaFollette Act of August 24, 1912, 37 Stat. 539, 555. Although the majority is of the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. In Re SawyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Boske v. ComingoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
  3. Eberlein v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1921
  4. United States v. WickershamSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
  5. Carter v. ForrestalCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1949

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API