Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
YOUNG, Justice.
Appellants, William C. Kindred and Ernest J. Kurtz brought a products liability action against Con/Chem, Inc., the manufacturer of Cono Prime X, alleging that they had sustained personal injuries from the use of that product. Their petition alleged two defects: failure to adequately warn of the dangers of using the product and unreasonably dangerous design. The trial court submitted special issues on the failure to warn theory which the jury answered in the negative. Whereupon the trial court rendered a take nothing judgment. The refusal of the trial court to submit…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Garza v. AlviarTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Boatland of Houston, Inc. v. BaileyTexas Supreme Court · 1980
- Turner v. General Motors Corp.Texas Supreme Court · 1979
- Southwestern Bell Telephone Co. v. ThomasTexas Supreme Court · 1977
- Trevino v. TrevinoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kindred v. Con/Chem, Inc.Texas Supreme Court · 1983
- Wright Way Construction Co. v. Harlingen Mall Co., Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1990
- James Garland Carter v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Debra Davidson v. Stanadyne, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1983
- Patterson v. GesellschaftDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1985
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.