Legal Opinion

Bright Harvest Sweet Potato Co. v. Idaho-Frank Associates, Inc.

District Court, W.D. Arkansas

Decided July 26, 2018No. 2:18-cv-02072Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS FORT SMITH DIVISION BRIGHT HARVEST SWEET POTATO CO. PLAINTIFF v. No. 2:18-CV-2072 IDAHO-FRANK ASSOCIATES, INC. AND MARK LYONS DEFENDANTS OPINION AND ORDER Before the Court are Defendants’ motion to dismiss (Doc. 19), brief in support (Doc. 20), and Plaintiff’s response in opposition (Doc. 23). For the following reasons, the Court finds that Defendant’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 19) should be denied. I. Background Plaintiff filed a Complaint against Defendants under the Perishable Agricultural Commodities Act of 1930 (“PACA”), 7…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Skinner v. SwitzerSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
  4. Hamilton v. PalmCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
  5. Arthur Gallagher v. City of ClaytonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API