Legal Opinion

People v. Ackerman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1890PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Exceptions before judgment from superior court of Grand Eapids. (Burlingame, J.) Eespondent was convicted of having kept open, as the agent of Henry Huber, the saloon of his principal on a legal holiday. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

Morse, J.,

The defendant was convicted in the superior court of Grand Rapids upon an information under the liquor law of 1887 of having kept open, as the agent of one Henry Huber, the saloon of said Huber upon a legal holiday, to wit, April 30, 1889.

Two objections only are urged against the legality of this conviction:

1. That April 30, 1889, was not a legal holiday within the intent and meaning of the statute.

2. That, as there was but one business carried on at this saloon, and that by Huber, and as there could be but one violation of the law in keeping the saloon open on that day, and Huber…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. People v. CoxMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. People v. ColletonMichigan Supreme Court · 1886
  3. Reithmiller v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. People v. RepkeMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  2. People v. HawkinsMichigan Supreme Court · 1895
  3. People v. WarrenMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  4. State v. KochMontana Supreme Court · 1906
  5. People v. HeikkalaMichigan Supreme Court · 1924

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API