Legal Opinion
State Board of Dental Examiners v. Pollock
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided February 15, 1927No. 17281PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHarrison, J.
This is an appeal from an order, issued by the district court of Oklahoma county, enjoining the State Board of Dental Examiners from canceling defendant in error’s certificate to practice dentistry, and involves the validity of chapter 41, S. L. 1919, now article 2, chapter 79, C. S. 1921.
The material facts are that the State Board of Dental Examiners charged defendant in error, Dr. Leo. L. Pollock, with practicing dentistry under a certificate alleged to have been procured through fraud, and with employing an -unlicensed assistant as a dental hygienist in his office, both of which are made…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ledegar v. BockovenSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1919
- Ex Parte HunnicuttCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- State v. CoyleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1912
- Stout v. State Ex Rel. CaldwellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Leach v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1920
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Shaw v. GrumbineSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929
- Wallace v. GassawaySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
- Peters v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1934
- Reeves v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1927
- Taylor v. New System Prosthetic Dental Laboratory, Inc.Cuyahoga County Common Pleas Court · 1932
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.