Legal Opinion

Monroe v. City of Woodville, Miss.

District Court, S.D. Mississippi

Decided June 15, 1988No. Civ. A. W85-0088(B)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BARBOUR, District Judge.

Introduction

This unusual vote dilution case is brought under Section 2 et seq. of the Voting Rights Act of 1965 as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 1973 et seq., the Thirteenth, Fourteenth and Fifteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution, and 42 U.S.C. §§ 1981, 1983 and 1985. The Plaintiffs are black registered voters of the City of Woodville, Mississippi. Plaintiffs allege that the city’s at-large electoral system whereby all of the aldermen are elected at large dilutes black voting strength. They seek to have the city divided into four single-member electoral…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Charles F. Zimmer, Stewart Marshall, Intervenor-Appellant v. John J. McKeithenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  3. East Carroll Parish School Board v. MarshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Mars Ketchum v. Jane M. ByrneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
  5. Tony Campos, Cross-Appellants v. City of Baytown, Texas, Cross-AppelleesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Mississippi State Chapter, Operation Push, Inc., Cross-Appellees v. Ray Mabus, Governor of Mississippi, Cross-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1991
  2. John Monroe v. City of Woodville, MississippiCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API