Legal Opinion

Tony Campos, Cross-Appellants v. City of Baytown, Texas, Cross-Appellees

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 1, 1988No. 87-2359PublishedCited by 132 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge:

This is a voting rights case. We uphold the district court’s finding, as not clearly erroneous, that the at-large election of City of Baytown council members constitutes a violation of § 2 of the Voting Rights Act of 1965, 42 U.S.C. § 1973 (Supp.1987) (as amended June 29, 1982), because of vote dilution of the politically cohesive combination of Blacks and Mexican-Americans. However, the 5-3-1 plan, proposed by the city and adopted by the district court, has not been precleared. See 42 U.S.C. § 1973c. We, therefore, vacate the district court’s approval of the plan and…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Thornburg v. GinglesSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. City of Mobile v. BoldenSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. White v. RegesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1973

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by132 opinions

  1. Growe v. EmisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Preston v. Tenet Healthsystem Memorial Medical Center, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2007
  3. Nipper v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1994
  4. Jenkins v. Red Clay Consolidated School District Board of EducationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
  5. Hollinger v. Home State Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2011

127 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API