Legal Opinion
Interstate Production Credit Ass'n v. MacHugh
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided February 10, 1998No. 15908-6-IIIPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSweeney, J.
The question here is whether Lyle and Barbara MacHugh, the debtors, are entitled to loss of use damages after successfully asserting an equitable estoppel defense to a foreclosure action. The court concluded they were not. We agree and affirm.
FACTS
The MacHughs owed Interstate Production Credit Association (IPCA) $2,646,888.74 in agricultural loans and interest. The loans were secured by mortgages and an unrecorded quitclaim deed to part of the MacHughs’ farm. In 1986, IPCA sued to foreclose. The property was in receivership until 1989. In 1989, the court granted IPCA’s summary judgment to…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
- State v. GreenwoodWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- W. T. Watts, Inc. v. SherrerWashington Supreme Court · 1977
- Norco Construction, Inc. v. King CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1986
- Cogswell v. BrownWashington Supreme Court · 1918
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- GMAC v. Everett Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2014
- Martinez v. Kitsap Public Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1999
- Spectrum Glass Co. v. Public Utility District No. 1Court of Appeals of Washington · 2005
- Labor Ready, Inc. v. AbisCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2001
- Kenney v. ReadCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.