Legal Opinion
IN RE: FRAGRANCE INDIRECT PURCHASER ANTITRUST LITIGATION
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided February 21, 2025No. 2:23-cv-03249Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW JERSEY IN RE: FRAGRANCE DIRECT PURCHASER Case No, 2:23-02174 ANTITRUST LITIGATION Case No. 2:23-03249 IN RE: FRAGRANCE INDIRECT PURCHASER ANTITRUST LITIGATION Case No. 2:23-16127 IN RE: FRAGRANCE END-USER PLAINTIFF OPINION GRANTING IN PART ANTITRUST LITIGATION AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ RULE 12(b)(6) MOTIONS TO DISMISS WILLIAM J. MARTINI, U.S.D.: Before the Court are motions to dismiss three consolidated putative class action complaints brought against the same defendants for violations of state and federal antitrust laws and state…
2Cases cited61 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Foman v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Burtch v. Milberg Factors, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2011
56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.