Legal Opinion
Brian Ingber, Cross-Appellee v. Lee Enzor, Superintendent, Fci Danbury, Cross-Appellant
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 1, 1988No. 423, 670, Docket 87-2312, 87-2372PublishedCited by 76 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MINER, Circuit Judge:
The United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Brieant, Ch.J.) granted in part and denied in part Brian Ingber’s motion for relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and vacated one of his convictions for mail fraud in light of the Supreme Court’s decision in McNally v. United States, — U.S. —, 107 S.Ct. 2875, 97 L.Ed.2d 292 (1987). Ingber appeals from so much of the judgment as denied his request for relief, and the government cross-appeals from the district court’s decision to vacate one of Ingber’s convictions. We conclude that McNally applies…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Griffith v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Leary v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Stromberg v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- McNally v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by76 opinions
- Ben Gary Triestman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1997
- United States v. DeFries, Clayton E.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1997
- United States v. Mario Biaggi, Stanley Simon, Richard Biaggi, Peter Neglia, John Mariotta, and Bernard EhrlichCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- United States v. John C. Mandanici, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2000
- United States v. Thomas E. KeaneCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1988
71 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.