Legal Opinion · Dissent

Darvin M. v. Jacobs

New York Court of Appeals

Decided May 5, 1987Published

1DissentTitone, J.

In holding that probation violation charges may be "presented” to the court by either the Probation Department or the District Attorney, or both, the majority has overlooked the important distinctions between the roles and responsibilities of those two law enforcement agencies. In the process, the majority has redefined the responsibilities of the District Attorney’s office in a manner that relieves it of the duty to represent the People’s interest in the important area of securing appropriate punishment for recidivist probationers. Since the conclusion the majority has reached is neither…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Schumer v. HoltzmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. People v. Van SickleNew York Court of Appeals · 1963
  3. Matter of Lewis v. . CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  4. People v. MackellNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  5. People v. MackellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API