Legal Opinion

People v. Van Sickle

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 10, 1963PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Chief Judge Desmond.

I join in the court’s negative answer to the only question presented to us on this appeal, that is: must a criminal conviction be reversed solely because the lay complaining witness was allowed to conduct the prosecution? If there was before us for decision the much broader question as to the District Attorney’s rights and duties I would say that the courts as well as the District Attorney himself must obey the plain, clear mandate of subdivision 1 of section 700 of the County Law. That statute does not necessarily mean that the District Attorney or his deputy must be…

2Cited by49 opinions

  1. People v. CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Conway v. Village of Mount KiscoCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1984
  3. Read v. SaccoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  4. People v. SoddanoNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
  5. People v. VialCriminal Court of the City of New York · 1986

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API