Legal Opinion
Aronson v. Sprint Spectrum, L.P.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided January 12, 2000No. Civ.A. 99-1796PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ZIEGLER, Chief Judge.
Pending before the court is the motion (doc. no. 2) of defendants, Sprint Spectrum, L.P., Sprint Communications Company, L.P., and Sprint Personal Communications Services (collectively “Sprint”), to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6) and the motion (doc. no. 5) of plaintiffs, Mark B. Aronson and Joseph G. Kanfoush, to remand pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) for lack of jurisdiction. For the reasons that follow, defendants’ motion will be denied and plaintiffs’ motion will be granted.
I. FACTS
On or about September 23, 1999, plaintiffs…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Caterpillar Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Metropolitan Life Insurance v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Avco Corp. v. Aero Lodge No. 735, International Ass'n of MacHinists & Aerospace WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- McKee v. AT & T CORP.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
- McKee v. AT&T Corp.Washington Supreme Court · 2008
- TPS Utilicom Services, Inc. v. AT & T CORP.District Court, C.D. California · 2002
- Aronson v. Sprint Spectrum, L.P.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2001
- In Re Wireless Telephone Radio Frequency EmissionsDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2002
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.