Legal Opinion
Turchick & Kempter v. HURD & TITAN CONST.
Colorado Court of Appeals
Decided April 28, 1983No. 81CA1123PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PIERCE, Judge.
Defendant, Tom Hurd, doing business as N & J, Inc. & Construction (Hurd), seeks review of the trial court’s denial of his motion to alter or amend or vacate a default judgment under C.R.C.P. 54(b). We dismiss the appeal.
The chronology of procedural events relevant to our disposition is as follows.
Plaintiffs, Keith Kempter and John Roberts (Kempter), along with Joseph Turchick and Frank Yanni, filed a complaint in June 1976, alleging in their first claim that Hurd and, in their fourth claim, that Hurd, Adolphson and Peterson Construction Company, and Seaboard Surety Company…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Frow v. De La VegaSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Seatrain Shipbuilding Corp. v. Shell Oil Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Harding Glass Co. v. JonesSupreme Court of Colorado · 1982
- United States of America, for the Use of R. F. Hudson v. Peerless Insurance Company, United States of America, for the Use of R. M. Bartenstein, John H. Bartenstein, and Michael H. Kelly, T/a R. M. Bartenstein & Associates v. Peerless Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1967
- Murray Ferguson, as Trustee in Reorganization of Equitable Plan Company v. Bartels Brewing Company (Pa.)Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1961
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Kempter v. HurdSupreme Court of Colorado · 1986
- Corporon v. Safeway Stores, Inc.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1985
- Public Service Co. of Colorado v. LinneburColorado Court of Appeals · 1984
- Salomon Smith Barney, Inc. v. SchroederColorado Court of Appeals · 2001
- Hall v. BornschlegelColorado Court of Appeals · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.